Note. —This resolution the Bulletin. Please notify errors so that corrections BOARD MEETING OF: CALENDAR NO.: PREMISES: ACTION OF BOARD THE VOTE — Affirmative: Chair Ottley-Brown, Negative: THE RESOLUTION The decision September 15, 2023, I1, reads, in pertinent Proposed side Proposed rear The proposed amendment 04-BZ and does referred to the approved plans This is an application granted pursuant to Group (“UG”) III(B)1 requirements for FAR, exposure plane (Z.R. (Z.R. § 24-33). This for Girls (the “School”). A public hearing after due notice by hearing on November Commissioner Yoon area. 1 Under the City of Yes (“UG”) for a school (as to UG III(B). Community Board application. The Premises are lot line, located on Street and Beach 8th approximately 350 depth ranging from triangular point at area, the Premises 32,858 square feet of The Board has 8, 2005, when, under variance, pursuant district, the expansion coverage (Z.R. § 24-11), side yard (Z.R. § 24-35), and all work substantially monitor be present times; the masonry as shown on the BSA-approved the certificate of occupancy; by the Board, in jurisdiction objection(s) only for the portions compliance with all the Administrative jurisdiction irrespective the relief granted. In this instant previously approved School. Specifically, building’s second and As for the first floor, existing pool with lectures, and prayer; existing locker room and add a staircase floor, the applicant feet to create space spaces; a new bathroom; would enlarge the third classrooms; three new the applicant indicates portion of the third requirements of Local The applicant Board to grant or increase notes that, while the 32,858 square feet FAR) to a new total Resolution permits square feet (2.00 FAR) states that the proposal perimeter wall height, side and rear yard widths. constitute an extension existing first-floor Specifically, the applicant yard would remain enlargement, would of the northeastern above; and the rear and would become enlargement. As such, the building’s bulk envelope existing foundation In the subject Resolution requires (Z.R. § 24-35) and a 36). The Zoning Resolution or modify [its] provision[s] public safety secured First, the applicant programmatic needs the proposed enlargement applicant contends to accommodate its School would have members in the next staff/faculty from the staff/faculty. The applicant needed floor area for crucial to the School’s locate at the Premises previously determined continue to create complying strictly with by general circumstances Next, the applicant the applicant is a not-for-profit respect to realizing The applicant the variance would impair the appropriate detrimental to the use comports with neighboring lots’ use effects of the enlargement the decrease in side third floors of the School located on the subject use map and rear between buildings on located to the rear of 59, 61, 63, 65, 67, 72, away from the Premises, Moreover, the analyses the Premises on the are approximately at 29 feet to nearly distances are sufficient the neighboring buildings’ privacy and prevent proposes to fit the the new rooftop heating, with a 6-foot-high, class (“STC”) 28); accessing the roof. The applicant further the School’s existing traffic. The applicant grant based on Department the School has designated arrival and dismissal; communicates with prevent overcrowding. School’s increase in 75 staff and faculty associated increase because these additional drop-off zone, they maintains that traffic prospective students located two blocks traveling to the vicinity Accordingly, the alter the essential character Premises are located; development of adjacent public welfare. The applicant unnecessary hardship predecessor in title. nor a predecessor in rather, the School’s within the physical Accordingly, the Board unnecessary hardship predecessor in title. The applicant minimum necessary applicant submits that impact the relief provided require any new or variance remains in

… (truncated, full text in PDF)