Note. —This resolution in the Bulletin. Please formal errors so that CORRECTION: under Calendar as follows: BOARD MEETING OF: CALENDAR NO.: PREMISES: ACTION OF BOARD THE VOTE — Affirmative: Chair Commissioner Negative: Absent: Vice-Chair THE RESOLUTION The decision 2, 2024, acting on Proposed reduced pursuant to Z.R. Reduced parking Section 73-44. This is an application 44, to permit a reduction spaces for a Use Group A3 (“PRC-A3”), ambulatory contrary to Z.R. § A public hearing 2024, after due continued hearings to decision on June Community Board application. The Board local civic organization incompatibility of The Premises located on the northeast Maple Avenue, within Growth Management approximately 199 frontage along Maple Premises are currently The applicant the relocation of its location to the Premises. a two-story, 23,640-square-foot facility with 39 parking pursuant to Z.R. § treatment healthcare every 300 square used for storage. As feet of floor area, applicant seeks the Z.R. § 73-44 states, In the districts may permit parking spaces 21 (General Provisions) A3 to the applicable forth at the end occupancy by faith on the basis a case the Board issued for the that no certificate to a use listed off-street parking provided on the For the subject parking requirement square feet of floor III(B) ambulatory required parking of floor area or cellar Z.R. § 12-10 for definitions As a threshold boundaries of a designated which the subject its determination dictates, in relevant imposed, “the hazards such special permit…at advantages to be derived permit,” and that and air in the neighborhood by appropriate conditions location of the site, First, the applicant in PRC-A3 is contemplated submitted a narrative for-profit healthcare the Port Richmond applicant represents services, Birthing nutritional counseling, Center fitness activities, copy of a brochure dated August 20, 2024, that “confirm[s] that main facility from Grove Avenue, Staten Appeals grants the the applicant’s proposed is contemplated in Next, the applicant have any adverse conducted transportation (collectively, the 36.2% of patients while remaining transportation, including and connecting bus shows that cumulative proposed development staff demand, would p.m. to 2:00 p.m.), weekday demand, and appointments Study determines have to be accommodated network on a typical period and it identified that would remain Future No-Action and Saturday peak 76%, 79%, and 88%. be ample additional accommodate the typical weekday resulting Additionally, permitted as of right would comply with pursuant to the subject spaces. Moreover, a radius diagram foot radius of the developed with community commercial and residential, uses or are vacant, residential use. The with the character continue to benefit Over the course concerns about vehicular response, the applicant exit, and one-way identified the corner plan notes related hazardous materials conditioning (“HVAC”); agreement, an updated there is a 12-foot-deep lot line from adjacent submitted a copy County, which found, clear of any easements Egbert Sq. Realty, After Trial (N.Y. Sup. Sq. Realty, LLC v. No. 1466-001, Decision 10, 2009). The project is 617.2 of 6 NYCRR. of the proposed action the project in the 2025. The EAS documents significant adverse socioeconomic conditions; historic and cultural natural resources; infrastructure; solid transportation; air change; noise; public disadvantaged communities. By letter dated Commission states archeological significance. By letter dated Environmental Protection March 2015 Phase surrounding area commercial uses stations with buried dry cleaners, railroad 12 historical auto underground storage within 1/4 mile; 13 manufactured gas Between August 2018 on the subject property were collected from from borings RI-SB-1 from 2-3.5 feet bgs were collected from 11. Soil samples were from boring RI-SB-12. and 7-7.5 feet bgs from 2.5-3 feet bgs samples were collected boring RI-SB-15. 8.5-9 feet bg

… (truncated, full text in PDF)