Note.—This resolution in the Bulletin. Please formal errors so that BOARD MEETING OF: CALENDAR NO.: PREMISES: ACTION OF BOARD THE VOTE — Affirmative: Chair Commissioner Commissioner Negative: THE RESOLUTION The decision 6, 2022, acting on pertinent part: Respectfully for the following 1. The proposed proposed 2. The proposed required provided[;] 3. The proposed proposed This is an application permit the construction Group (“UG”) 4 contrary to zoning (Z.R. § 25-30), and A public hearing after due notice hearings on February on September 19, Brown, and Commissioner and the surrounding recommends denial The Board received of objection citing received a petition 188th Street and Queens, objecting The Premises intersection of 188th district, in Queens. 188th street, 92 feet feet of lot area, the Originally, the cellar and subcellar, floor area (0.83 FAR), feet, and zero accessory described the proposed along the western yard along the northern front yard along the 20-foot-deep front Street. Regarding the subcellar would and one women’s accessory to the mikvahs, bathroom facilities, cellar would contain closet, bathroom applicant stated that with fixed seating office, and restrooms, prayer hall with fixed office, and a restroom. would be fully sprinklered all accessibility requirements, would stop at all floors. that the property portion of the southern In response to revised the proposed elevator bulkheads, landscaping details. wide side yard along foot-wide side yard a 15-foot-deep front Road; and a 20-foot-deep on 188th Street. subcellar would have the mikvahs, a waiting mechanical room. neighboring residences a Sound Transmission building, the applicant by landscaping consisting 6-foot-high, wrought-iron-atop-masonry In the subject a maximum FAR and 23-141). Regarding community facility aggregate width of two side yards, each width of street walls. proposed building’s feet. Based on this, provide two side yards parking, Z.R. § 25-30 zoning district provide persons rated capacity the proposed plans capacity for 306 persons, accessory space per be 30.6, rounding Accordingly, because side yards with, respectively, off-street parking The Zoning Resolution “vary or modify [its] observed, public § 72-21. First, the applicant conditions inherent programmatic needs—that hardship in complying are not created district. Specifically, seven primary needs (1) First, the sufficient space for applicant represents, Chart, that the congregation for 85 attendees attendees (max capacity) with capacity for 32 capacity) by the fifth (2) Second, the space for lectures (3) Third, the for youth programming (4) Fourth, the social hall for special ceremonies and to namely, for collective and additional space (5) Fifth, the one office for the Rabbi lectures, and classes. (6) Sixth, the to be used for general the youth director (7) Seventh, women that would daily—are necessary The applicant to provide these submitted an as-of-right worship with 4,487 western side yards the main level, and, spaces. The applicant because it would maximum capacity), and subcellar-level sanctuary by 22 including an approximate persons. The applicant scenario would not the applicant submits for the subcellar, alternative design, subcellar would represents that this second alternative and the subcellar design, the applicant require the construction to the subcellar which program space. Furthermore, and second alternative accommodate the manage the lifts, and unnecessary attendance would be using vehicles. as-of-right design programmatic needs. Accordingly, conditions create complying strictly created by general Next, the applicant the applicant is a be made with respect The applicant alter the essential appropriate use detrimental to the applicant submitted the FAR and side 7257, fronting on Road (“Study Area”). developed lots within (50%) have an FAR 0.49, and 4 (25%) equal to 21 feet. Regarding York City Planning reveals that, out of (100%) households Premises and would submit

… (truncated, full text in PDF)