Note.—This resolution Bulletin. Please notify that corrections may MEETING OF: CALENDAR NO.: PREMISES: ACTION OF BOARD THE VOTE — Affirmative: Chair Ottley-Brown, Negative: THE RESOLUTION The decision 2017, acting on Alteration part: “The street the official A) No Certificate Section B) Proposed perimeter or frontage Building This is an application zoning district, the to a single-family, facility (daycare A public hearing notice by publication 2019, March 24, 15, 2021. Commissioner surrounding neighborhood. The Premises Sea Gate Avenue Brooklyn. With feet of depth, and occupied by a single-family, The applicant residence to a facility used for will comply with including the proposed applicant states proposed building Over the course not the plans will of the building. In response, which illustrated proposed sprinkler 1. The Premises The applicant Premises maps released 2. The property 3. Application 4. Proposed Proposed alteration base flood elevations; NYC • applying NYC • applying NYC • Construction. Building • BSA • By letter dated (“DEP”) states that (dia.) City water proposed sanitary Connection Proposal the existing 8" dia. proposed water be maintained by Based on the above, application. By letter dated Department, Bureau application. As (height) a sprinkler subsequent filing 321260130) that Premises. The department The Board Board makes no whether it complies located below base Accordingly, with certain conditions substantiated a Therefore it hereby modify the 2017, acting on vested in the Board construction of a that all work and application marked condition: DOB THAT the Premises THAT the above THAT a certificate THAT number (“BSA November 15, 2025; the Department THAT plans comply to regulations as if this approval THAT to objections cited the approved THAT related to the specific the Department THAT applicable provisions any other relevant configurations not Adopted by the
2017-59-A
Proposed enlargement of a one family home to a one family home with attic and community facility not fronting on a legally mapped street, contrary to General City Law 36. R3-1 zoning district.
BSA Decision
Full decision PDF
View PDF →Decision Excerpt
Want to dig deeper into 2017-59-A?
Ask Zonable about the reasoning, similar precedent cases, or how it applies elsewhere.