Note.—This resolution publication in the Bulletin. typographical or other before the Bulletin is BOARD MEETING OF: CALENDAR NO.: PREMISES: ACTION OF BOARD THE VOTE — Affirmative: Chair Commissioner Commissioner Negative: THE RESOLUTION — The decision of the 21, 2020 acting on New pertinent part: 1. The proposed front yard 2. The proposed required 4. The proposed on corner 5. The proposed 61 as required This is an application allow, within an R3-1 plus cellar, single-family the zoning requirements 23-451), side yards (Z.R. in a flood hazard areas A public hearing after due notice by hearings on February and February 8, 2021 Vice-Chair Chanda inspections of the Community Board application. The Board letters of objection originally proposed neighborhood character of open air and sunlight. The Premises are Haven Avenue and Adams R3-1 zoning district, frontage along Haven of lot area, the Premises The applicant originally story, single-family residence floor used for storage area, 566.78 sq. ft. at floor), one 10'-0" front Adams Avenue, a northern yard measuring 20'-0", Haven Avenue, and a accessory parking in required planting along Board at hearing, the required accessory parking beneath the upper floors planting along both frontages. proposed width of the 0", as permitted by the Now, the applicant that would have 0.38 on the first floor that feet of floor area on the on the third floor), a a front yard on Haven yard with a width of and would not have a or trees or shrubs at In the subject R3-1 a two front yards with § 23-45, and two side see Z.R. § 23-461(a), direction change, raised feet high, see Z.R. § 64-62. requested herein. The Zoning Resolution “vary or modify [its] observed, public safety § 72-21. First, the applicant conditions inherent encumbered by mapped that create practical strictly with applicable general circumstances particularly, the applicant streets has created a 64.63 feet, which would feet in width at its widest Zoning Resolution. In support of this corner lots within 400 four comparable properties properties, 1) the first which is owned by the street, and, therefore another City owned lot a maximum width of buildable area as it is would require a GCL is held in common ownership enlarged via a tax lot The applicant also that strict conformance would result in an irregularly from 2'-7" at the southern line with 30 feet of depth, be viable to construct, space requirements for and, after the wall widths habitable due to size. underlying zoning development of the Premises Accordingly, the conditions create practical complying strictly with created by general circumstances Next, the applicant this application proposes made with respect to The applicant further would not alter the essential appropriate use or detrimental to the public the predominant use almost exclusively residential, family dwellings ranging proposed FAR of 0.38 and the applicant seeks consistent with the proposed project would the unique lot size, is Z.R. § 23-451. Accordingly, the alter the essential character the Premises are located; use or development of to the public welfare. The applicant represents unnecessary hardship predecessor in title. practical difficulties and are due to the unique severely limited building Accordingly, the or unnecessary hardship a predecessor in title. The applicant notes necessary to develop submits that all other the Zoning Resolution. Accordingly, the minimum necessary the Zoning Resolution. The project is classified Part 617.5 and the Board II action noted in the Based on the foregoing, record supports the findings and that the applicant discretion. Therefore, it is Resolved, does hereby make each Z.R. § 72-21 to permit, detached residence that for front yards (Z.R. yards (Z.R. § 23-461), condition that all work filed with this application Twelve (12) sheets; and the bulk parameters THAT front yard on Adams the northern lot line direction change, raised feet high; and planting constituting less than there s

… (truncated, full text in PDF)