Note.—This resolution in the Bulletin. Please formal errors so that BOARD MEETING OF: CALENDAR NO.: PREMISES: ACTION OF BOARD THE VOTE — Affirmative: Chair Commissioner Commissioner Negative: THE RESOLUTION This is an application a variance previously permitted the development retail building and contrary to use regulations 2021. A public hearing after due notice hearings on January decision on March inspection of the Premises Community application on condition the subject site’s Grace The Premises an R4 zoning district, frontage along Edson 190 feet, and 46,936 by a one-story, UG The Board notes located within the easement and zoning 6, as shown by the applicant; and contains permitted by the original Lot 18 is not the subject for an amendment 18 is subject to a BZ. The Board has 17, 2001, when, under a variance, under square-foot, Use Group facility”) and a 15,000-square-foot, feet of restaurant building”) (collectively, district, contrary to work substantially the variance be limited automatic wet sprinkler buildings and be Station; the above the development, Department of Buildings applicable provisions Code and any other substantial construction On April 4, 2003, No. 12-01-BZ, the permit the applicant second floors and and fifth floors with Department Approved On January issued a letter of substantial to permit the following Plan SG-1: The are now a single curb level. Plan SG-2: The BSA is now above curb level. Plan SG-3: A 30′-0″ above ground The term of the a 20-year extension deviations from the (1) relocation with disabilities site’s Grace Edson Avenue facility’s (2) the following (a) along dogwood previously junipers; (b) along maple instead juniper (3) the following (a) the relocation the building ensure (b) the applicant industry security; (c) the relocation the building (d) the installation and customer and (4) the following other improvements: (a) an increase approved, previously eastern, parking applicant existing (b) the addition building; (c) the absence The applicant conditions of the cause any negative applicant represents concerns, it proposes much as possible, landscaping provisions the subject zoning and Department applicant also explains facility are the following: the storage • o Monday o Sundays: access to • o Monday o Sundays: Furthermore, managed inside of once every two weeks By letter dated Fire Prevention, states been conducting annual no violations, and upon the foregoing, application and will applicable rules and Over the course landscaping, the improvement, and landscaping, the plantings that were had not been planted the general design that meets, as closely landscaping provisions ensure screening With respect the efficiency of the was required to be located directly outside New York, requiring City and approval DOB—and encouraged possible, be located that the applicant necessary approvals Moreover, the Board feasibility of eliminating along Grace Avenue. Moreover, the and informed the pavement in the parking and maneuverability from the street into banner sign from the parking lot and a a lumen spread diagram, the lumen levels to line and into neighboring In response to represents that it landscaping as possible, elements of the Zoning provisions (Z.R. § plans showing the that would be planted Avenue in conjunction including 5 hedge shrubs, 9 virginia purple wintercreeper goundcover plants. Furthermore, retaining wall design, attempted to redesign lot and off City property, presence of existing zoning lot’s property the full revocable to build the retaining improvement. The existence of the drainage the retaining wall. investigate elimination represents that it determined that pertinent part, reduce from roughly 9.5 slope at that location; existing building foundation. nonetheless revised the curb and increase approximately 21.6 the applicant represents consent process and construction. In revocable consent estimates full completion signoff by approximately Finally, in response site condition

… (truncated, full text in PDF)