Records not linked to a specific agenda item
Liet explicitly widens the objection: the anger 'isn't just about the fact that our zoo is obviously the wrong place for a data center. It's about a war being waged by the obscenely rich on all the rest of us.'
- The council should have the opportunity to fully consider the data-center land-use question BEFORE any project becomes vested.
- moratorium duration capped at ninety (90) days or until the companion data-center bill (BL2026-1391) passes, whichever comes first
Council Member Kyonzté Toombs: Where are we in the vesting-of-rights process for the parcel with the proposed data center next to the zoo?
Council Member Kyonzté Toombs: If the moratorium legislation goes on first reading tonight, we do not actually have a moratorium in place — correct?
Council Member Kyonzté Toombs: If the moratorium (or the other pending data-center legislation) passes, would there be any impact on data centers that already exist in Nashville?
Angie Henderson (Vice Mayor): Are all committee reports in for items on the consent agenda?
Council Member Toombs: Can you speak to the vesting of rights in the property — most public interest surrounds the proposed data center next to the zoo — and where we are in that process?
+1 more exchanges
- A late-filed ordinance — the temporary data center moratorium — placed on the agenda of a special called CAPITAL BUDGET meeting. — Angie Henderson
- Vice Mayor Henderson closes the public comment period; council moves to agenda item F1 — Angie Henderson
- Planning Commission expected to suspend its rules to convert the normal two-meeting deferral to a one-meeting deferral for the data center text amendment — compressing an already short timeline — Courtney Johnston
- Chair invited members to join the queue to request removal of any consent-agenda item; none did ('Alright. I am seeing none.', seg 457). — Angie Henderson
+2 more procedural steps