Records not linked to a specific agenda item
Commissioner Henley states that ALL written public comment received on item 10 was opposition-related, including a petition; no supportive public comment was received.
- Staff recommends APPROVE WITH CONDITIONS and DISAPPROVE WITHOUT ALL CONDITIONS — the conditions are not severable; failure to accept any one condition converts the recommendation to disapproval. The individual conditions are NOT read into the record (they live in the staff report).
- Approve with conditions (conditions not enumerated on the record; contained in the staff report).
- Approve with conditions (conditions not enumerated on the record).
- With the final site plan, the design of the retaining wall feature fronting Lloyd Avenue is to be modified to accommodate direct pedestrian connections from the units to the public sidewalk, if determined to be feasible.
- applicant states off-site improvements are required for this neighborhood as part of the SP framework
- Approve with conditions; disapprove without ALL conditions (standard Nashville SP conditional-approval posture — the conditions are not severable).
+11 more conditions
Greg Adkins: Chair Adkins asks staff whether item 6 belongs on the deferral/withdrawal list (it was not read out with the others).
Greg Adkins: Chair confirms with staff that the deferral/withdrawal list (items 1, 2, 3, 4, 9, 13, 14, 17) is correct before calling for a motion.
Cathy Leslie (Planning Commissioner): When you speak of streets, what if those developments have alleys that act as a street / provide access to the development — would an alley be considered a street?
Cathy Leslie (Planning Commissioner): Does that mean the alleys now constructed or used will be allowed to be above ground except for some exceptions?
Cathy Leslie (Planning Commissioner): Follow-up on what determines what is a street versus an alley, and whether the requirement reaches existing streets.
+29 more exchanges
- Chair Greg Adkins calls the May 28, 2026 Metropolitan Planning Commission meeting to order and moves directly to the agenda. — Greg Adkins
- Item D — the general public comment period at the start of the meeting — is described by the Chair as 'a relatively new rule for us'; he asks staff counsel Lisa to re-explain it one more time. — Greg Adkins
- Most Planning Commission items carry their OWN item-specific public hearing; the up-front comment period therefore exists for the narrow subset of items where (a) the public hearing has already been closed, or (b) no council-required public hearing exists. — Lisa Milligan
- Despite the newly state-mandated general public comment period, NO member of the public signed up to speak at item D. The Chair proceeds directly to item E. — Greg Adkins
+28 more procedural steps