Note. —This resolution the Bulletin. Please notify errors so that corrections BOARD MEETING OF: CALENDAR NO.: PREMISES: ACTION OF BOARD THE VOTE — Affirmative: Chair Commissioner Negative: Absent: Vice-Chair THE RESOLUTION The decision of 2023, acting on New pertinent part: “Proposed drive through located must be referred to This is an application zoning district, the Group (“UG”) VI, eating 16. A public hearing due notice by publication October 22, 2024, and Commissioner Ottley-Brown inspections of the site Community Board application and the The drive-thru • single lane exit. [The applicant] • through Thursday, Dark sky compliant • A total of 34 seats • Buffering residential • requires an 8' Adding lighting • board. The Board also Member for the subject restroom accessibility, waste management The Premises are bounded by 230th the east, within approximately 200 frontage along 230th Boulevard, and 19,877 occupied by a one-story The applicant accessory drive-through as-of-right, UG VI represents that it building and construct approximately 3,180 foot-deep front yard; 19'-10"; 9 accessory Pursuant to zoning district, a drive-through and drinking establishment Board pursuant to Z.R. requested herein. Z.R. § 73-311 states, In C1 through permit modification accessory drive-through VI, as set forth provided that the (a) the drive-through lot,: (1) for not drinking (2) at a sufficient expected (b) the drive-through traffic congestion pedestrian flow; (c) the character feet of the subject the motor vehicle, attributable the subject (d) the drive-through on residences In order to make quality impact headlights on (e) there will be through facility consist of densely walls, barriers The Board may safeguards to surrounding area. As a threshold boundaries of a designated which the subject special determination is subject relevant part, that, hazards or disadvantages permit…at the particular derived by the community “the adverse effect, neighborhood of such conditions governing design and method First, the applicant contains reservoir automobiles where sufficient capacity operation, where serving proposed plans demonstrating reservoir spaces. Accordingly, through facility contains Next, the applicant not create or contribute inhibit surface traffic is no reasonable expectation proposed development Impact Analysis (the quantity of reservoir limited restaurant congestion. Specifically, the development would and thereby would methodology of the indicates, in its existing study intersection operate better during each represents that the vehicles, measured circulation or parking. and reservoir space demand. The applicant both vehicular and ensure adequate circulation proposed plans, the cuts, one along each cut on Francis Lewis on 230th Street for Boulevard for both that given that 230th counterclockwise flow vehicles entering from and surrounding conditions, vehicles would be running north of the applicant adds that, adjacent to the subject driveway could only Merrick Boulevard only vehicles traveling right turn. The applicant 230th Street and that using the walk-up minority of patrons) but would be required Francis Lewis Boulevard circulation layout, quantities, would be Finally, the applicant site-design elements pedestrian safety. At the applicant represents vehicles, and a crosswalk the parking lot to immediately adjacent Lewis Boulevard entrance would post a “Do Not serve only as an egress provide a “Do Not drivers that this is that vehicles stopped be about 15 feet away their orders, drivers again and scan for sidewalk, the applicant exiting vehicles would foregoing, the applicant for safe and orderly Accordingly, the cause minimal interference Furthermore, the commercial street substantial orientation motor vehicle generation such area and to the Radius Diagram and subject block front 229th Street and development, including historically contained submitted site photographs approximately 100-foot-wide, the area. The applicant described

… (truncated, full text in PDF)