Note.—This resolution the Bulletin. Please errors so that corrections BOARD MEETING OF: CALENDAR NO.: PREMISES: ACTION OF BOARD THE VOTE — Affirmative: Chair Ottley-Brown, Negative: THE RESOLUTION The decision of 2019, acting on DOB “1. The proposed 2. The proposed proposed floor 3. The proposed maximum number 4. The proposed are no proposed 5. The proposed proposed street requirements 6. The proposed is a proposed certain districts.” This is an application a site located partially 1 zoning district, the that would not comply maximum number (Z.R. § 23-461), height A public hearing notice by publication Vice-Chair Chanda, performed inspections Community Board Board received one opposition to this application. the proposed variance and congestion of the The Premises Avenue and 28th approximately 20 feet square feet of lot area, repair shop. The applicant building that would buildings, maximum parking spaces. Accordingly, The Zoning Resolution modify [its] provision[s] secured and substantial At hearing, the demonstrated that unique condition inherent varying zoning regulations. provided insufficient conditions might be unnecessary hardship. would comport with depth of the front whether the reduction hardship imposed by By letter dated application without Therefore, it is Adopted by
2020-9-BZ
Variance (§72-21) to permit the development of a two-family, two story dwelling contrary to underlying bulk requirements. R4A zoning district.
BSA Decision
Full decision PDF
View PDF →ZR Sections Cited (5)
Decision Excerpt
Want to dig deeper into 2020-9-BZ?
Ask Zonable about the reasoning, similar precedent cases, or how it applies elsewhere.