Note.—This resolution Bulletin. Please notify the so that corrections may CORRECTION: Calendar No. 2020-2-BZ BOARD MEETING OF: CALENDAR NO.: PREMISES: ACTION OF BOARD THE VOTE — Affirmative: Chair Ottley-Brown, Negative: Absent: THE RESOLUTION — The decision of 10, 2019, acting on Department No. 321999236, reads “Existing Mezzanine use is contrary requires a Special pursuant to Zoning This is an application Procedures, reinstatement previously granted by permit, pursuant to an existing building blinds. A public hearing due notice by publication April 7, 2020, and then Commissioner Ottley-Brown, inspections of the Premises Brooklyn, recommends The Premises are Third Avenue, within approximately 100 feet along Third Avenue, by an existing one-story, warehouse and assembly floor area. The Board has exercised 1957, when, under BSA permit the change of bottling and storage of that the building not comply with all laws, fighting appliances be of the building be painted proposed use; if and Third Avenue is carried the wall on the new obtained, all work completed, within one year, by June On June 18, 1957, decision of the borough from the second floor, as a mezzanine, not be floor from such mezzanine such conditions as filed On October 10, 1967, the variance to extend condition that loading, the sidewalk; other than respects; and, a new On May 4, 1971, amended the variance 1981, on condition that substantially as shown the application; other respects; and, a new On December 21, permitted the installation that all work substantially the sign be limited to applicable be complied within one year, by December On February 21, granted an extension condition that the roof revised drawings of proposed completed within one amended the resolution On June 23, 1981, to Z.R. §§ 11-411 and the existing one-story warehouse and storage condition that all work application; the term properly cleaned and as it is maintained accessory building for the use applicable be complied within one year, by June On May 11, 1982, the variance to legalize substantially as shown condition that other respects. The term of the reinstatement. Because the expiration of the 14.2 of the Board’s Rules 1-07.3(b)(4)(i), of the The applicant submitted bills to continuously application. The applicant further to 2,329 square feet of alterations, extensions authorized under the special permit, pursuant The applicant warehouses, and offices, Venetian Blinds, two enlargement will legalize for storage. The enlargement use is not permitted As to the prerequisites through testimony demonstrated that: pursuant to ZR § 52-70; has lawfully existed use where the existing five years; the subject Z.R. §§ 11-412, 43-121 not UG 18. The permitted enlargement area occupied by the applicant proposes to feet, from 559 gross applicant represents and that all activities the building. The applicant portion has no applicable assembly process are Premises. The applicant The applicant states exceeds 16 feet above coincides with a rear applicant states that feet above curb level a rear lot line of a zoning no open uses of any that coincides with a applicant states that within eight feet of the lot in a residence district. R6B district. The applicant represents storage, will not generate traffic, nor will cause enlargement used for has not generated an applicant states that, Premises, the enlargement requirements. The applicant berths and states that character of the neighborhood impair the future use Based upon the safeguards imposed, due to the proposed special be derived by the community. any pending public improvement that the evidence in under Z.R. §§ 73-53 and The project is classified 617.5. The Board has in the CEQR Checklist Therefore, the Board supports the requisite 53 and 73-03 and that exercise of discretion. Therefore, it is Resolved, hereby issue a Type II §§ 5-02(a) and 5-02(b)(2) Quality Review, permit the reinstatement of 539-56-BZ as amended every one of the required the enlargement of

… (truncated, full text in PDF)