Note.—This resolution in the Bulletin. Please formal errors so that BOARD MEETING OF: CALENDAR NO.: PREMISES: BOARD: ACTION OF THE VOTE — Affirmative: Chair Commissioner Commissioner Negative: THE RESOLUTION This is an application, (“DOB”), pursuant 666(6)(a), to revoke August 25, 2003, reinstate Certificate The CO indicates and basement building under the 1968 Building on the basement through DOB submits improperly permits residential zoning Board pursuant to permitted the erection dwelling that encroaches Specifically, family residential sprinkler system and the job application sprinkler installed. A public hearing 2017, after due continued hearings 2018, October 23, 2019, and February Chair Chanda, Scibetta performed neighborhood. The testimony from an DOB to revoke the The Premises 25th Avenue and 28th Premises have approximately depth of 100 feet, three-story residential On June 19, granted a variance permit the erection that encroaches on substantially conform with the application; family dwelling be issuance of a building libre, page, and date regulations applicable be completed within On July 28, 195655, which reflected and second floors recreation, laundry, In 2002, a registered No. 401501264 (the dwelling into a Certification procedure, architect] exercised the filed application as of this date. I am and accuracy of this that the application rules, DOB did not prior to its approval August 25, 2003, On March 26, granted an amendment permit three-family condition that a deed dwelling be filed and to the issuance of the Certificate of recording of said the Board imposed conform to drawings the drawings for full not file, or obtain them, pursuant to progress, as determined Department of Buildings of the conditional revoke the amendment; the approval and approval be limited specifically cited and, DOB ensure Zoning Resolution, laws under its configuration(s) not DOB states that audit, in December from the Buildings DOB issued a Notice to Z.R. § 11-62, Failure Authorizations or stated that the “application from 2 to 3. 103-79-BZ this premises shall comply with the conditions constitute the basis DOB Queens Borough Premises on December an Alteration Type of Standards and remove the conditions not respond. On April another letter of Commissioner, reiterating response. Over the course coordinate changes with DOB, to legalize dwelling and maintained that the Board Application are enclosure, as was The DOB further Alt 1 Application, the installation of detectors. By correspondence that DOB permits made toward the residential occupancy unable to pursue occupancy and intends accordance with Amended Variance 1979 Variance, thereby that the building By letter dated support of the instant As discussed restricted, the occupancy Amended Variance a three-family residential make substantial Premises by the Department within six months The owner has acknowledged use of the Premises represents that completing Board notes that accordance with the owner, DOB, and Accordingly, Certificate of Occupancy unlawfully issued. Therefore, it of Buildings seeking and Certificate of revoked. Adopted by the Board the
2017-144-A
Appeal filed by the Department of Buildings seeking to revoke Certificate of Occupancy.
BSA Decision
Full decision PDF
View PDF →ZR Sections Cited (2)
Decision Excerpt
Want to dig deeper into 2017-144-A?
Ask Zonable about the reasoning, similar precedent cases, or how it applies elsewhere.