2016-4169-BZ MEETING OF: April CALENDAR NO.: 2016-4169-BZ 230 Block BIN ACTION OF BOARD — Application THE VOTE TO GRANT – Affirmative: Chair Perlmutter, Commissioner Sheta and Commissioner Negative: ..................................................................................................................................0 THE RESOLUTION: WHEREAS, the decision 2016, acting on Department of Buildings ZR 42-00: The property no residential occupancy WHEREAS, this is an M1-1 zoning district, the development residential building, contrary to WHEREAS, a public hearing due notice by publication in The March 20, 2018, and April 17, 2018, WHEREAS, Vice-Chair inspections on the site and surrounding WHEREAS, Community application because of the size set a precedent for larger developments WHEREAS, the subject Avenue and White Street, in an WHEREAS, the site has of 88 feet, 2,188 square feet of lot WHEREAS, the applicant Use Group 2 multi-family residence floor area ratio (“FAR”) of 2.2 and WHEREAS, pursuant to zoning district and, thus, the applicant WHEREAS, the applicant width and vacancy of the site are unnecessary hardship in developing regulations; and WHEREAS, the applicant subject premises and an M1-1 zoning square feet of lot area or less, are lots and 24 lots (52 percent) are WHEREAS, at hearing, subject block of Boerum Street, the study area; and WHEREAS, the applicant subject premises and an M1-1 square feet of lot area or less, are 2016-4169-BZ lots; and WHEREAS, the applicant for modern manufacturing use, vacant since the demolition of residential WHEREAS, accordingly, of the site are unique physical conditions in developing the site in conformance WHEREAS, in satisfaction reasonable possibility that a conforming return and, in support of that contention, right industrial building (the “AOR WHEREAS, the financial subject proposal will generate Development will result in a loss and WHEREAS, upon review accordance with ZR § 72-21(b), reasonable possibility that a requirements will provide a reasonable WHEREAS, the applicant the appropriate use or development public welfare in accordance with portion of Boerum Street east of residential use—of the 35 lots developed, at least in part, with either side of the subject lot, thus would be compatible with the subject WHEREAS, the applicant but revised the proposal in response reduce the height of the building residential buildings on the lots premises; and WHEREAS, in response synthetic stucco system, an unattractive proposed building, the applicant the subject building and the front WHEREAS, in addition, building will be located no closer adjacent building on an adjoining WHEREAS, the Board character of the neighborhood nor it be detrimental to the public welfare; WHEREAS, the applicant grounds for the variance was not with ZR § 72-21(d); and WHEREAS, the applicant necessary to afford relief because WHEREAS, accordingly, necessary to afford the owner relief; WHEREAS, the project 617.2; and WHEREAS, the Board 2016-4169-BZ and has documented relevant Assessment Statement (“EAS”) WHEREAS, the EAS documents significant adverse impacts on Land Community Facilities; Open Space; and Visual Resources; Natural Resources; Solid Waste and Sanitation Services; Emissions; Noise; Public Health; WHEREAS, by letter Environmental Protection (“DEP”) Construction Health and Safety acceptable and requests that, at Remedial Closure Report indicating (i.e., installation of vapor barrier; soil in accordance with NYSDEC fill/top soil capping requirement concrete/asphalt, etc.) be submitted WHEREAS, by a separate facilities within a 400 foot radius exceed applicable impact thresholds air quality impacts; and WHEREAS, with respect any noise attenuation beyond the would not result in a significant WHEREAS, the New reviewed the proposal and noted at 221 McKibbin Street on the neither architectural nor archaeological WHEREAS, in light of conditions the subject grant on Technical Policy and Procedure Avoid

… (truncated, full text in PDF)