Note.—This resolution the Bulletin. Please notify errors so that corrections BOARD MEETING OF: CALENDAR NO.: PREMISES: ACTION OF BOARD THE VOTE — Affirmative: Chair Ottley-Brown, Negative: THE RESOLUTION This is an application variance previously permitted the development building and a UG 16 use regulations (Z.R. A public hearing due notice by publication June 14, 2021, September 2023, and then to Brown performed an Community Board application on condition subject site’s Grace The Premises an R4 zoning district, frontage along Edson feet, and 54,188 square one-story, UG 6 restaurant The Board notes located within the easement and zoning the copy of the recorded contains the UG 16 However, the Board instant application of term of the variance decision under BSA The Board has 2001, when, under variance, under Z.R. square-foot, UG 6 building 8,000 square feet of foot, Use Group (collectively, the “two to use regulations (Z.R. conform to the BSA-approved limited to 20 years, system be installed to a Fire Department appear on the certificate subject to verification compliance with all the Administrative jurisdiction of DOB; accordance with Z.R. On July 17, 2003, No. 13-01-BZ, the permit the loading that it would be parallel for delivery vehicles; increase from 93 to buildings) between dumpster and a sign only for the workers telecommunications between the subject plans, namely, a 16-foot-wide to access at the western workers of the adjacent and the tentative tax Tentative Lot 8 to Tentative by the City Surveyor, calculations dated June On March 9, 2006, issued a letter of substantial reconfiguration of interior from restaurant and that DOB ensure compliance Zoning Resolution, to the proposed change at the site do not exceed shown on the approved triggers such non-compliance, effect. On November Cal. No. 13-01-BZ, installation of an illuminated, on condition that DOB the Zoning Resolution, extent the sign determination have The term of the 20-year extension and permit a proposed Specifically, the applicant from the previously (1) relocation of of the subject Lot 32 with (2) the following plan: (a) 16 new northern (b) 1 tree building; (3) a pylon sign surface area with all relevant the previously (4) relocated and have less total approved plans; (5) one additional the retail building, spaces on the The applicant redesignation of nine use by the retail building actual usage. The approved plans, all berths are on its own required parking spaces that the retail building spaces are instead contention, the applicant facility’s trucks using these spaces are neither Board should approve Furthermore, community concerns, site’s Grace Avenue of operation for the following: the laundromat: • the check • days-a-week; the restaurants: • week; and the market: • o Monday o Sunday: By letter dated Prevention, states determined that these system (sprinkler) and 2019, and permits Department has no to inspect these Premises Over the course landscaping, the design improvement, and landscaping, the Board plantings that were not been planted and general design and ensures adequate screening With respect to efficiency of the applicant’s required to be built directly outside the requiring the applicant approval from the Department encouraged the applicant wholly within the Premises. submit a detailed completing construction Moreover, the informed the applicant pavement in the dumpster in a steel-doored diagram indicating conduct a lumen spread that no light spills from In response to represents that it previously approved an operational plan support, the applicant landscaping diagrams, procedures for spring area care, mulch application, Furthermore, in wall design, the applicant redesign the retaining property, but it was drainage infrastructure therefore, it was necessary and obtain DOB and complete the sidewalk plan to evidence prevented the relocation represents that it has received the approvals the applicant submitted BPP, and a construction improveme

… (truncated, full text in PDF)