Dewitt Clinton Park North (629 West 54th Street
with 2 related matters · LU 0076-2026 · LU 0077-2026
- height reduction to 510 ft
- facade redesign to masonry/contextual
Loading...
CEQR: Other
Community Board 4 is one of the most pro-housing boards in Manhattan, so when it told the council to deny the DeWitt Clinton Park North towers, that was the news. Two developers, an affiliate of Friedland Properties on 12th Avenue and an affiliate of Chapman Group on 11th Avenue, want to rezone two manufacturing sites at 801 11th Avenue and 629 West 54th Street into a 38-story and a 44-story mixed-use building. Together they would add 1,094 apartments, roughly 273 of them permanently affordable under Mandatory Inclusionary Housing option one. Auto showrooms would fill the three-story bases. The catch is the deal funding the height: the developers would buy unused floor area from Hudson River Park and pay the Trust no less than $29.7 million.
Councilmember Gail Brewer, who said she has signed off on 250 ULURPs, was not buying the framing. When the team pitched the $29.7 million as a community benefit, she cut in: that money buys them extra height, so 'that's not a donation, that's development higher. That doesn't count in my book.' She pressed on three fronts the board flagged: cut the 12th Avenue roof from 550 feet, push affordability past 25%, and add family-sized units. The applicants agreed to drop to 510 feet, to provide at least 15% family-sized units, and to integrate affordable apartments with identical finishes, but held to MIH option one because it aligns with the 485X tax break.
Paul Devlin, co-chair of CB4's land use committee, sharpened the fight. The board wants 30% affordability and workforce housing in the 100 to 125% AMI band, not another building full of 60% AMI units it already has plenty of. He noted a nearby 18 FAR project on 57th Street tops out at 385 feet, proof you can get density without height, and that the air rights here sell at $200 per square foot versus the $300 the Block 675 deal fetched. Hudson River Park CEO Noreen Doyle backed the transfer, saying the proceeds are earmarked to rebuild Pier 76, a 5.5-acre former NYPD tow pound sitting on 6,500 rotting piles.
Both DeWitt Clinton items were heard and laid over for continued negotiation. The Greenpoint Monitor Point hearing opened right after, with Councilmember Restler describing towers as tall as 56 stories of primarily luxury housing just feet from the long-promised Bushwick Inlet Park.
that's my one like kind of quibble with uh this product is I would really like to see a better ground floor usage than an auto dealers
“city of Yes for housing opportunity passed by the council in December 2024 is projected to produce about 82,000 new homes over 15 years.”
— Louise Carroll
“a zoning map tax amendment, two special permits, including the establishment of a large-scale development plan and a city map amendment”
— Chair Lewis
“these developments would develop more than one thousand new residential units, including twenty-five percent permanently affordable homes”
— New York Building Congress representative
with 2 related matters · LU 0076-2026 · LU 0077-2026
with 4 related matters · LU 0068-2026 · LU 0070-2026 · LU 0069-2026 · LU 0071-2026
Heard, hearing opened with no vote recorded. The Monitor Point proposal would redevelop an MTA-owned Greenpoint waterfront site in Councilmember Restler's district with two buildings and a museum space, roughly 1,150 apartments and about 40% affordable, in towers as high as 56 stories that Restler called primarily luxury housing feet from Bushwick Inlet Park.
Restler frames himself as not committed to the project: he urged delay for the incoming administration (rejected), argues for clear majority affordable housing as essential to his being open to it, and presses repeatedly on luxury rents and park encroachment
Concerns: inadequate open space · significant flood risk · environmental burdens · overburdened infrastructure
with 2 related matters · LU 0074-2026 · LU 0073-2026
Gail Brewer: within the building, the 65% integrated units — would they have the same finishes/appliances in affordable and market-rate apartments
Chair Lewis: What are the MTA's main goals when it considers redeveloping properties it oversees, and how does this proposal meet them?
Chair Lewis: What happens to the MTA property if this application is not approved? Does the mobile wash unit stay?
Chair Lewis: Explain the agreement with the Greenpoint Monitor Museum; how will you support its development; does the org have means to manage a museum of over 30,000 sqft?
Chair Lewis: 40% affordable comes from developing one building as 100% affordable with HPD, but unlike MIH this isn't required by zoning - what guarantee that the HPD-financed building actually happens?
+13 more exchanges
+18 more procedural steps
Public testimony: 1 in favor
Sarah Roberts · Jonathan Jackson · Shishank Shamshabad · Executive Director, Southside United (S1/S10) · Bill Wilkins · Chuck Brass · Kate York · Zoe Raphael · Christopher Leon Johnson · Frank Lang · +28 more
Every parcel, owner, and applicant in this meeting, cross-referenced against Zonable’s NYC ownership, enforcement & legislative graph — the record behind the record.
Owner portfolios, open OATH/ECB violations, 311 & DOB permits across every parcel discussed, developer track records, and an “ask this meeting” chat.