The one where Council approved Fulton Street BID tax overhaul after 18 years of stagnation
Contents & search
The Finance Committee approved a package of financial measures, including Intro 0791-2026, which amends the assessment formula for the Fulton Street Business Improvement District (BID), commonly known as FabFulton. The vote was unanimous—14 ayes, no nays or abstentions—despite vocal concerns from Councilmember Sandy Mealy about the financial burden on small commercial property owners. The committee also passed a budget extender bill and five preconsidered resolutions granting real property tax exemptions under Articles 5 and 11 of the Private Housing Law for developments in Councilmembers Breu, Nurses, and Osay’s districts, including Hudson View 2 and 3 at 315 Harmon Street and 984–988 Green Avenue.
The core of the hearing centered on the Fulton Street BID’s request to modernize its 15-year-old assessment formula, which currently taxes properties based on 80% front footage and 20% assessed value, with a $120 corner fee. The proposed change shifts to a hybrid model: 50% of commercial square footage, 30% frontage, and 20% assessed value, with the corner fee rising to $3,050. Residential properties, previously charged $1, will now pay 25% of the commercial rate, while vacant lots will be assessed at 125% of the base rate. Deputy Commissioner Calvin Brown and FabFulton Executive Director Angie Brown testified that the overhaul corrects inequities that have grown as the neighborhood’s built environment evolved since 2009. They emphasized that all stakeholders—including property owners, merchants, and residents—were consulted through public meetings and board reviews.
Councilmember Mealy raised strong objections, recalling that the BID had previously refused to expand into her district, and now, with the new formula, her constituents would be taxed without proportional benefits. She expressed concern that small businesses, already strained, would face higher property tax assessments. Councilmember Hudson, whose district includes the BID area, defended the change, citing new development and improved public services like sanitation and programming. She noted that the BID receives $75,000 annually through SBS’s small BID grant program. Councilmember Lewis clarified that the tax falls on property owners, not business tenants—a key distinction for small operators leasing space.
The approval means the BID can now collect more equitable assessments reflecting current land use, funding continued services like street cleaning and community events. However, the shift may increase costs for some commercial property owners, especially those with large footprints but limited square footage. The change also brings residential and vacant properties into the funding pool more meaningfully. Residents and developers in the Fulton Street BID zone—particularly along Fulton Street between Franklin Avenue and Grand Army Plaza—should review how their properties are classified under the new formula. The next step is City Council approval, but with strong BID and agency backing, the measure is likely to move forward.
The decisions
7Hudson View II, Block 2076, Lot 46 and 49, Manhattan, Community District No. 9, Council Districts No. 7.
Article V
Article XI
TBK 1001B St. Nicks Alliance - 315 Harman Street, Block 3279, Lot 41, Brooklyn, Community District No. 4, Council District No. 37.
TBK 1001B St. Nicks Alliance - 984-988 Greene Avenue, Block 1622, Lot 34, Brooklyn, Community District No. 3, Council District No. 36.
A Local Law to amend the administrative code of the city of New York, in relation to amending the district plan of the Fulton Street business improvement district to change the method of assessment upon which the district charge is based
Approved a budget extender bill, sponsored by the committee chair by request of the mayor, revising the date for the mayor to submit the proposed executive budget and budget message along with certain other dates in the budget process. It passed 14 to 0 with three members absent.
Also in the record
Records not linked to a specific agenda item
Hudson: Why do you feel they need the assessment of 50% instead of 30%? Because store owners are being seem like overtaxed.
Deputy Commissioner Calvin Brown: The new formula uses a combination of commercial square footage, frontage, and assessed value to ensure equitable contributions based on the built environment; it's not a flat 50%.
Linda: Why do they need the frontage?
Deputy Commissioner Calvin Brown: Frontage is included to capture storefronts with no upper commercial space, ensuring fair contribution based on physical layout.
Hudson: Could you explain the lots, the vacant lots?
Angie Brown: Vacant lots will be assessed at 125% under the new Class D, ensuring they contribute fairly despite no active use.
Lewis: So this assessment is on the property owners, not the business owners.
Councilmember Linda Lee: The assessment is on property owners, not business owners, clarifying financial responsibility under the new formula.
The people
The intelligence
Every parcel, owner, and applicant in this meeting, cross-referenced against Zonable’s NYC ownership, enforcement & legislative graph — the record behind the record.
Sign in for the full graph
Owner portfolios, open OATH/ECB violations, 311 & DOB permits across every parcel discussed, developer track records, and an “ask this meeting” chat.