The one where a Mets-owner casino on Citi Field's parking lots split Queens into rival union choruses and flood-and-park

Argues Queens Future proposes to privatize 77 acres of public parkland for a hotel and casino complex including nine-story parking garages and 15-to-26-story towers.

Says the promised 20-acre park is actually a seven-acre privately-owned, steeply graded plaza tucked between the hotel complex and Citi Field.

Says Flushing Bay receives over two billion gallons of raw sewage and polluted stormwater yearly; development will increase demand on the Bowery Bay Wastewater Treatment Plant.

Says Queens Future fails to give sufficient clarity in its FEIS on how it will comply with the city's unified stormwater rule.

Says the borough president received seventy written comments against the project and just three in support.

Cites Crain's reporting that in 2024 Queens Future spent the most of anyone lobbying dozens of city officials; asks supporters to disclose financial relationships.

Argues demapping the casino parcel makes Flushing Meadows Park forever smaller; asks for a no vote on the demapping or an acre-for-acre replacement requirement.

Urges a no vote on the commercial zoning, arguing the commercial rent x acreage x height x lease yields billions in profit making the current benefits list crumbs.

Urges council members not to vote by deference given the applicant's extreme lobbying and paid support.

Cites AALDEF 2024 exit polls finding nearly 70% of Asian American voters in NY and nearly half of Flushing-area respondents strongly opposed to the casino.

Cites the city's own racial equity data that Flushing, Corona and Elmhurst have the highest risk of displacement of any Queens neighborhoods; non-white populations over 94% and poverty rates over 50%.

Argues the EIS adopted a mere quarter-mile-radius study area (mostly Flushing Bay, Corona Park, Willets Point), so displacement of small businesses and tenants is unstudied; fails CEQR's 'hard look' requirement.