The one where the Council passed everything 50-0 — except the casino, which split the chamber
Contents & search
At this stated meeting the Council adopted its entire general-orders calendar 50-0 , a slate of Brooklyn and Queens rezonings and affordable-housing dispositions (41 Richards Street, 341 10th Street, 80-01 Broadway) that had cleared the April 17 land-use committees. The drama was one item: N 240179 ZRY (LU 57 / Res 392), a casino-gaming-related zoning text amendment. Members peeled off to vote no or 'aye-except-57' across the political map , Yeger, Marte, Paladino, Marmorato, Krishnan and Hanif opposed, while Hudson, Joseph and Salaam backed it with stated reservations about the review process
“a UDAP approval disposition of city owned property and an article 11 tax exemption to facilitate the preservation of 8 buildings”
— Adrienne E. Adams
“would call on the New York state legislature to pass and the governor to sign the packaging reduction and recycling infrastructure act”
— Adrienne E. Adams
“with which representatives to leave and Bowman introduced in March with the support of United Musicians and Allied Workers”
— Shahana K. Hanif
“I wanna thank council member Avilaz and her team for their steadfast leadership and support in bringing the 341 10th Street rezoning”
— Shahana K. Hanif
The decisions
9Block 232, Lot 1; Block 238, Lot 35
L.U. No. 41
“HPD”
L.U. No. 57
Cadman Towers: Block 232, Lot 1; Block 238, Lot 35, Brooklyn, Community District 2, Council District 33.
Gaming Facility Text Amendment
Voted on the Gaming Facility Text Amendment, the citywide zoning rules (LU 57 / Res 392) that govern how proposed casino sites get reviewed.
- only applicants who submit before 06/30/2025 and are awarded one of 3 gaming facility licenses after CAC approval and gaming facility location board recommendation may operate
- potential sites limited to high density commercial and manufacturing areas
Yeger objects that the amendment leaves casino approval to the local district council member, so members whose districts are a block away would have zero say.
Yeger argues a yes vote removes a tool of review the council uses for land use matters and is a blanket statement of approval for the concept of casinos in neighborhoods.
- LU 57 / Res 392 (Gaming Facility Text Amendment, Citywide) coupled on general orders. — City Clerk
97-22 CRESSKILL PLACE
Took up the disposition of 97-22 Crest Hill Place, tied to Motion 0007-2024.
- LU 63 and Res 396 (97-22 Cresskill Place disposition) recommitted to Land Use committee and not coupled on general orders — Amanda C. Farías
Motion by Council Member Williams to recommit LU 63 and Res 396 back to Land Use.
Also in the record
Records not linked to a specific agenda item
- 10:07 a.m.
- 12:23 p.m.
- Council Member Salamanca tested his audio at the start of the meeting — Rafael Salamanca, Jr.
- Sergeant calls chamber to order, asks members to take seats and staffers to leave the main floor — Sergeant-at-Arms
+17 more procedural steps
The people
Public testimony: 4 in favor · 8 opposed
Martin Chang · Adrienne E. Adams · Sandy Nurse · Selvena N. Brooks-Powers
The intelligence
Every parcel, owner, and applicant in this meeting, cross-referenced against Zonable’s NYC ownership, enforcement & legislative graph — the record behind the record.
Sign in for the full graph
Owner portfolios, open OATH/ECB violations, 311 & DOB permits across every parcel discussed, developer track records, and an “ask this meeting” chat. For this meeting: 2 311 complaints across the 1 site.