88-08 Justice Avenue Restrictive Declaration Termination
Addressed the restrictive declaration recorded against 8808 Justice Avenue. The declaration on that specific site was the matter at issue before the committee.
Loading...
CEQR: Other
Kevin Riley's subcommittee ran four votes and five hearings, but two fights dominated. At 341 10th Street in Park Slope, Stellar Management's rezoning drew sustained pushback: Council Member Aviles pressed on F/G train disruption and 'significant adverse impact,' tenants warned the project would 'disrupt F and G' service, and one speaker called out Stellar for launching a website to 'dispel' criticism. Then Willets Point Phase 2 / NYCFC's all-electric stadium and 250-room hotel brought a wave of supporters - union locals, youth-soccer coaches, EDC and Fox Rothschild - testifying in English and
“rezone uh corners of four intersections within Queens Community Board 1 from existing R5D zoning districts to R6A with a C24 commercial overlay”
— Richard Lobel
“we looked at it from historic resources perspective, land use perspective, urban design perspective, a detailed pedestrian circulation analysis”
— Alex Lieber
“pursuant to the city of yes proposals, there as you know we've kind of discussed together, there is um you know a likelihood that there would be a parking reduction”
— Richard Lobel
“this site was rezoned not too long ago in 2010 as an R five D, which allows two FAR and up to four stories. Did you consider developing as a right”
— Kevin C. Riley
Addressed the restrictive declaration recorded against 8808 Justice Avenue. The declaration on that specific site was the matter at issue before the committee.
with 1 related matter · LU 0025-2024
Took up the Jennings Hall Expansion proposal in Brooklyn. The named expansion was the subject brought forward for review.
This Queens application sought approval to develop a new seven-story mixed-use light-industrial and office building. The seven-story manufacturing-and-office program was the core of what was presented.
with 1 related matter · LU 0028-2024
The East 94th Street rezoning in Manhattan was brought before the committee. The Upper East Side map change was the matter under consideration.
with 4 related matters · LU 0031-2024 · LU 0032-2024 · LU 0033-2024 · LU 0034-2024
This proposal to re-envision the Willis Avenue site was presented as an ambitious reuse of land that once served as a dumping ground for the city's ash waste and has since been cleaned. The remediation of the former ash site framed the development pitch before the committee.
with 1 related matter · LU 0042-2024
This Park Slope proposal to build two new residential buildings and rehabilitate an existing third was heard, carrying four separate land-use actions bundled into a single application. The combined scope was the defining feature put before the committee.
with 1 related matter · LU 0045-2024
with 1 related matter · LU 0038-2024
The City Planning Commission voted to approve this Astoria rezoning and MIH mapping for a mixed-use residential development on March 6th, arriving at the Council after the Queens Borough President had already issued a conditional approval at her own public hearing. The application now reflects two layers of prior sign-off ahead of Council review in CM Caban's district.
with 1 related matter · LU 0040-2024
This Astoria rezoning and MIH mapping for a mixed-use residential development was taken up before the committee. The application pairs the map change with mandatory inclusionary housing to enable the new housing on the site.
Kevin C. Riley: Hope you get a promotion
+11 more procedural steps
Public testimony: 2 in favor
Mildred Santana · Chris Battress · Jenny Lando · Washington J Torres · Sergio Muniz · Chelsea Quito · Hunter Walker · Carrie Bloss · Robert Hahn · Yuk Ying Chen · +10 more
Every parcel, owner, and applicant in this meeting, cross-referenced against Zonable’s NYC ownership, enforcement & legislative graph — the record behind the record.
Owner portfolios, open OATH/ECB violations, 311 & DOB permits across every parcel discussed, developer track records, and an “ask this meeting” chat. For this meeting: 1,009 oath/ecb hearings across the 5 sites discussed.